Were to sharpen up the software from a good grounding in Web standardsĪnd how to use HTML correctly, this is a product I could encourageįor the moment it’s a good start, and a better product than many. The positive side and could be a good starting point. Them either as some of the other software has done. While not entirely fostering accessible Web pages, it doesn’t hinder Tool for an ordinary person wanting to put together a good Web page, but Of the software I’ve explored so far, this is the best. The coding behind the scenes is of a high standard, though not alwaysĮntirely appropriate, and I can’t edit the HTML unless my page is of the While I cannot apply a list-something I use almost any time I create a Mark a subscript or superscript-all tags I have very very rarely used, The menu items offer an almost randomĪssemblage of HTML coding: I can easily choose to strike through text or RapidWeaver does quite well, as far as it goes. ![]() ![]() Some limited formatting options you can apply to text in the Edit tab. If you choose one of these styles there are With RapidWeaver, each page has an underlying style, such as Styled Text, Irritating, that doesn’t affect the accessibility of output, but it does I found the Edit view confusing and unnecessary-why not just have CodeĪnd Preview views, available side-by-side and both editable? While Graphic elements included with the theme, such as lines and party Page, with the chosen theme applied, along with layout and any
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |